Chapter 25: Issuing 8Ds to Your Own Suppliers

If you're a Tier 1 or mid-market Tier 2 supplier, you're likely issuing 8Ds to your own component suppliers. The discipline is the same, but the leverage is different. You control the timeline and the closure criteria. Use that responsibility carefully.
When you identify a nonconformity in incoming material or a supplier's delivered product, structure your SCAR using the same 8D format. Require the same gate discipline. The first test of your supplier corrective action system is whether you enforce 8D rigor as much on your suppliers as your customers enforce it on you.
Many facilities maintain a SCAR register, often a simple spreadsheet, tracking all open 8Ds:
- Part number
- SCAR number
- Open date
- Gate deadline
- Current discipline
- Responsible supplier contact
- Closure date
This register is routinely audited and reviewed at management review meetings. It's a simple tool that prevents SCARs from falling through the cracks.
By the time you've completed D0 through D8 with evidence at every gate, you've not only satisfied your customer's SCAR requirement and your ISO 9001 corrective action obligation—you've embedded organizational learning and prevented future escapes. That's the power of disciplined 8D execution.
Need guidance on your certification journey?
Our consultants have prepared more than 250 manufacturers globally — from growing businesses to large enterprises — for successful certification. Get a free, no-obligation consultation tailored to your industry.
The next chapter will walk you through how to verify that your corrective actions are actually effective, which is where many organizations falter even after closing an 8D.
Ready to strengthen your 8D execution and corrective action discipline? PinnacleQMS helps Canadian suppliers structure, track, and defend 8D reports with portal-ready documentation and gate compliance. Whether you're responding to Ford, GM, or Pratt & Whitney Canada SCARs, or issuing them to your own suppliers, our guidance ensures you meet auditor expectations and close gates on time. Schedule a consultation to discuss your corrective action workflow and learn how to reduce SCAR cycle time while improving effectiveness.
Chapter 24: Portal Submission and Closure Best Practices for Canadian Suppliers
When you're responding to a customer SCAR, you're typically submitting via a web portal: Ford's SCR (Supplier Corrective Request) portal, GM's GQTS, or Pratt &
Chapter 26: When to Issue a SCAR vs. a Return-to-Vendor vs. an Informal Correction
The first question every quality manager asks is the hardest: "Is this nonconformance serious enough to warrant a formal SCAR?"
Request a Consultation
Fill in your details and we'll get back to you.

